[clay tax collector figure*] |
What do Irish traditional houses, California avocados and Hungarian
sausages have in common? They are all the unintended results of government tax
policy. While those tax laws are long off the books, their impact is still
visible.
[Irish traditional stone cabin] |
A traveler in the countryside of Ireland immediately notices that the
traditional cottages have tall doors and very few windows. While such a layout
may be logical in terms of insulation, i.e., keeping in the heat during the
cold winter, the actual reason is far more fiscal, specifically to avoid the
heavy English tax on houses with more than six windows. The Irish referred to
this levee as the “typhus tax” as the lack of air circulation created ideal conditions
for the disease. This strange result demonstrates that what is convenient for
the tax collector is not always beneficial for the taxpayer even beyond the financial
element.
[avocados] |
California is a major player in the world food production market,
producing just about everything, including rice. Avocados are a more recent significant addition, dating from around 1970. The state now provides the vast majority of US domestic production, almost 140 thousand tons. While the tree does produce
commercial amounts quickly and the product has a high commercial value, the
actual trigger for the massive investment in this fruit was US income tax
policy. Apparently, there was a closing of a loophole in the federal tax code
for citrus and almond orchards, which had allowed the rich to avoid paying
taxes for many years. Instead, in compensation, for seven years, from 1970 to
1976, the congress made it very worthwhile to invest in avocados. The
government has long since eliminated this tax break but avocados have gone from
being exotic to common. They are an example of a fruit of the IRS’s labor.
[Hungarian sausage with cabbage] |
Finally, Hungary has hundreds of types of sausage, ranging in size,
taste and spiciness. However, most of them are made from pork, not beef. Pork
is often the preferred meat in counties where the land is insufficient or does
not support cattle. In Hungary, the cause of this preference is actually tax,
notably that not imposed by the Ottomans when they ruled the country from 1541-1699.
As Muslims, they did not eat pork. Consequently, they did not tax pork,
rendering it the least inexpensive meat. Even today, the tax is relatively low,
at 5%. This preference shows that the belief that taxing a forbidden item is to
recognize it and therefore encourage it is apparently incorrect.
Every country has had its own style of taxation weirdness. Some of the
results were temporary and disappeared upon cancellation of that policy. Others
have impacted a nation long after the knowledge of the law disappeared from
people’s memories. In any case, the
results of taxation policy can be very surprising.
* Picture captions allow the blind to fully access the Internet.
All pictures via Pixabay
No comments:
Post a Comment