Trump’s
controversial announcement to move the US embassy to Jerusalem has elicited a
larger than usual number of skew comments.
What I mean is that the various reactions do not relate to the same
Jerusalem although the name of the city is the same.
To explain, to
religious and ideological Jews, Jerusalem is the soul of Judaism, the basis of
the faith, and is symbolized by the Wailing Wall and Temple Mount. Without Jerusalem, Israel has no anchor for
existence. While this image is very strong and commonly felt even by
non-religious Jews, it ignores many facts. A Jewish state without Jerusalem in
ancient times did exist when there was a split between Judah and Israel.
Secondly, administratively and population wise, East Jerusalem is more
Jordanian/Palestinian than Israeli. Many
of its key institutions are directly or indirectly run by Amman, including the
educational system and Waqf. Despite the fact that Jerusalem was united more
than 40 years ago, it remains a divided city.
That does not
mean that the official Muslim portrayal of Jerusalem is any more accurate. In
the eyes of many Muslim, Jerusalem is the city from where Mohamed rose to
heaven. Its holiness is symbolized by the Golden Dome Mosque, Al-Aqsa. Jewish
control of the area represents a spiritual threat to the religion as a
political threat to the Palestinians, who also consider Jerusalem as their
religious anchor. This approach ignores the fact that the mosque is build on
the ruins of a church, which is built on the ruins of the two ancient Jewish
temples, which was built in the area conquered by the Jewish King David from
the ……. There is no certainly no clear
Muslim or even Arabic title to this land. Moreover, the Koran does not even
directly mention Jerusalem, although the city may be referred to indirectly.
Thus, to claim that Jews have no title to the city is ridiculous.
The “neutral”
international attitude to Jerusalem is muddled. Jerusalem has an important
place in Christianity. Yet, Christian access is not threatened either by the
former or new US position. More importantly, the world is bewildered by the
fervency and lack of rationality in regards to any discussion regarding the
city’s status. Thus, it prefers to bury the issue under the carpet and allocate
to later discussions between the disputing parties, who so far cannot agree on
far simpler matters. On the other hand, like any fundamental dispute, the
status of Jerusalem and its holy places will continue to heighten tensions to
everybody’s loss. It is a bit of a Gordian knot. It is often forgotten that
Jerusalem is not only a symbol but also a real city with people trying to cope
with a complicated geographical, architectural, political and social structure.
My view is that
fundamentally Trump’s declaration and eventual implementation changed very
little. In any case, the US Embassy would be located in West Jerusalem. This
move would not in fact prevent the Palestinians from having their own state and
making East Jerusalem their capital if such a solution is ever agreed upon. The
facts on the ground should (but do not always) determine the reality. The two state solution is theoretically
possible with Jerusalem as a divided city, albeit not necessarily according to pre-1967
borders on the condition that freedom of religion for all is maintained and the
parties can agree.
Yes, I know the
John Lennon song Imagine comes to mind, hopefully or cynically. In any
case, we need a bit of Naomi Shemer‘s light to enter the Middle East and allow
people to live their lives in peace. Let all of us pray to the peace of
Jerusalem, whichever city you have in mind.
If we can make that happen, anything is possible.
No comments:
Post a Comment